Source: http://www.stargeek.com/keyword_density.php
use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic
Huwebes, Mayo 31, 2012
Search Term Research
requires an username and password but it has lots of features. They claim to have the biggest database, with over 9 billion searches compiled from 37 sources that include major international, pay per click, meta and regional engines. You can search on spell:keyword, related:keyword, like:keyword and crawl:keyword . The tool will search Overture's data from 16 different countries. There is just too much to list here. Go sign up and get take a peek.
Source: http://www.prioritysubmit.com/research.html
use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic
Atom & RSS Feed Validator
RSS feeds validator. It may validate any kind of RSS feeds, from the simplest ones to the most complex ones.
Source: http://www.feedvalidator.org
seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book
Google PageRank Prediction
Looks at your URL and predicts what your Page Rank will be at the next PR update based on the backlinks Google shows.
How Many Search Engines?
How many search engines do you typically use in a given month?
Most people only use 1 or 2 search engines in any given month.
| Vote | All�(1223)� |
|---|---|
| 1 | 48.9%�(+3.1 / -3.1) |
| 2 | 26.2%�(+2.9 / -2.7) |
| 3 | 9.1%�(+2.2 / -1.8) |
| 4 | 4.7%�(+2.0 / -1.4) |
| 5 or more | 11.1%�(+2.3 / -2.0) |
There isn't much difference between men & women on this front.
| Vote | Men�(669)� | Women�(554)� |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49.4%�(+4.0 / -4.0) | 48.4%�(+4.8 / -4.8) |
| 2 | 25.5%�(+3.6 / -3.3) | 26.9%�(+4.6 / -4.1) |
| 5 or more | 10.6%�(+2.9 / -2.3) | 11.7%�(+3.8 / -3.0) |
| 3 | 9.7%�(+2.8 / -2.2) | 8.5%�(+3.6 / -2.6) |
| 4 | 4.8%�(+2.5 / -1.7) | 4.5%�(+3.6 / -2.0) |
Surprisingly, older people are more likely to use a variety of search services while younger people are more likely to stick with their one favorite. I would have guessed that to be the other way around.
| Vote | 18-24 year-olds�(295)� | 25-34 year-olds�(300)� | 35-44 year-olds�(165)� | 45-54 year-olds�(204)� | 55-64 year-olds�(182)� | 65+ year-olds�(77)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54.9%�(+5.5 / -5.7) | 57.7%�(+5.7 / -6.0) | 45.6%�(+7.7 / -7.5) | 50.4%�(+6.9 / -6.9) | 48.1%�(+7.3 / -7.3) | 35.8%�(+11.5 / -10.1) |
| 2 | 23.0%�(+5.1 / -4.4) | 23.0%�(+5.4 / -4.6) | 23.1%�(+7.1 / -5.8) | 22.5%�(+6.3 / -5.3) | 29.2%�(+7.1 / -6.2) | 36.8%�(+11.3 / -10.1) |
| 3 | 5.8%�(+3.3 / -2.1) | 5.5%�(+3.4 / -2.2) | 13.7%�(+6.0 / -4.4) | 10.5%�(+5.0 / -3.5) | 11.5%�(+5.5 / -3.9) | 7.0%�(+8.0 / -3.9) |
| 4 | 6.8%�(+3.5 / -2.4) | 4.7%�(+3.3 / -2.0) | 4.2%�(+4.7 / -2.3) | 4.9%�(+4.3 / -2.3) | 2.1%�(+3.8 / -1.4) | 5.4%�(+9.1 / -3.5) |
| 5 or more | 9.6% (+3.9 / -2.8) | 9.1% (+3.9 / -2.8) | 13.4% (+6.2 / -4.4) | 11.7% (+5.3 / -3.8) | 9.0% (+5.2 / -3.4) | 15.0% (+9.7 / -6.3) |
Here is the geographic breakdown.
| Vote | The US Midwest�(260)� | The US Northeast�(320)� | The US South�(374)� | The US West�(269)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53.6%�(+6.5 / -6.6) | 45.1%�(+6.1 / -6.0) | 47.0%�(+5.8 / -5.7) | 50.4%�(+6.4 / -6.4) |
| 2 | 22.7%�(+6.2 / -5.2) | 27.1%�(+5.7 / -5.1) | 26.8%�(+5.5 / -4.8) | 27.9%�(+6.1 / -5.4) |
| 3 | 8.7%�(+4.9 / -3.2) | 11.4%�(+4.8 / -3.5) | 8.6%�(+4.4 / -3.0) | 8.2%�(+4.8 / -3.1) |
| 4 | 3.5%�(+5.2 / -2.1) | 5.3%�(+4.3 / -2.4) | 5.7%�(+4.1 / -2.5) | 3.8%�(+5.4 / -2.3) |
| 5 or more | 11.5%�(+5.5 / -3.9) | 11.1%�(+4.7 / -3.5) | 11.9%�(+4.5 / -3.4) | 9.7%�(+5.2 / -3.5) |
Here are stats by population density.
| Vote | Urban areas�(608)� | Rural areas�(107)� | Suburban areas�(499)� |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.1%�(+4.5 / -4.5) | 50.2%�(+9.8 / -9.8) | 47.2%�(+4.7 / -4.7) |
| 2 | 26.4%�(+4.1 / -3.8) | 21.2%�(+10.6 / -7.8) | 27.8%�(+4.5 / -4.1) |
| 3 | 9.1%�(+3.6 / -2.7) | 14.2%�(+10.7 / -6.6) | 9.6%�(+4.0 / -2.9) |
| 4 | 5.3%�(+4.0 / -2.3) | 6.5%�(+12.0 / -4.4) | 3.8%�(+4.4 / -2.1) |
| 5 or more | 11.0%�(+3.8 / -2.9) | 7.9%�(+11.4 / -4.9) | 11.6%�(+4.2 / -3.2) |
Here is data by income groups. No obvious pattern here either.
| Vote | People earning $0-24K�(132)� | People earning $25-49K�(673)� | People earning $50-74K�(326)� | People earning $75-99K�(70)� | People earning $100-149K�(27)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45.0%�(+8.9 / -8.6) | 47.7%�(+4.2 / -4.2) | 50.2%�(+6.1 / -6.1) | 42.1%�(+12.3 / -11.4) | 48.3%�(+17.9 / -17.5) |
| 2 | 29.1%�(+9.0 / -7.6) | 26.3%�(+3.8 / -3.5) | 23.1%�(+6.2 / -5.3) | 35.2%�(+12.2 / -10.5) | 37.4%�(+18.8 / -15.6) |
| 3 | 8.7%�(+9.1 / -4.7) | 8.6%�(+3.2 / -2.4) | 11.6%�(+5.8 / -4.0) | 9.7%�(+11.7 / -5.6) | 0.0%�(+12.5 / -0.0) |
| 4 | 6.1%�(+9.5 / -3.9) | 5.2%�(+3.2 / -2.0) | 4.3%�(+6.3 / -2.6) | 2.6%�(+17.0 / -2.3) | 3.4%�(+22.2 / -3.0) |
| 5 or more | 11.0%�(+8.9 / -5.2) | 12.1%�(+3.3 / -2.7) | 10.9%�(+5.8 / -3.9) | 10.4%�(+11.9 / -5.9) | 10.9%�(+16.7 / -7.1) |
Categories:
Source: http://www.seobook.com/how-many-search-engines
seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink
Miyerkules, Mayo 30, 2012
How To Ensure You Get More From SEO
If you are trying to get an online business off the ground then you will probably be aware of how important SEO can be for your business. If you want your business to be a success then you will have to get more visitors to be able to find your website and this involves getting [...]No related posts.
Source: http://www.seo-leaders-online.co.za/seo/how-to-ensure-you-get-more-from-seo/
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Free Meta Keywords Tool
reads the meta keywords and gives you a hotlink with each keyword to Overture Keyword Selector Tool, Google AdWords Keyword Tool and Nichbot Free Keyword Identification Tool.
Source: http://www.apogee-web-consulting.com/tools/keyword_tool.php
Google Rank Position
allows you to enter a search term and the domain to search for. It returns the position that search term has on Google WITH, the number of entries that search term is indexed for, the PR of your home page, the size of file, the number of inbound links the site has and lets you know if you are in the DMOZ or Google Directory.
Source: http://www.prsearch.biz/
seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book
Martes, Mayo 29, 2012
Keyword Tool
The Free Keyword Tool by WordStream is the fastest, most accurate, most comprehensive online keyword suggestion tool available, aggregating over 1 billion unique keywords and hundreds of millions of related terms from diverse sources.
Source: http://www.wordstream.com/keywords/
seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book link building
Redirects And HTTP Headers Checker
Checks for redirects that may be in place on a domain (301, 302, 200, etc).
Search Term Suggestion Tool
allows you to enter a prospective keyword and it returns the related keyword phrases and the number of times they have been searched in the last month on Overture search engines such as Yahoo, MSN, Altavista and Hotbot. You use this kind of data to help you choose the keyword phrases you want to target. This tool is a "must use" as you don't want to target keywords that no one is searching for!
Source: http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/
seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book link building
Retrieve SERPs
Google dataceter SERP checker. Input the keyword and select the range of datacenter IP's and see the SERPs.
Internet Marketing Communication With Your Target Audience is Key 5 Tips
Why does success in the world of Internet marketing seem to come so easily to a few, while the rest seem to struggle with it at every turn
There are a few reasons for this common perception:
a
There are a few reasons for this common perception:
a
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Lunes, Mayo 28, 2012
Google AdWords Ads Add Album Cover & Song Preview
Before I get any drops of jupiter hate on the following...I was typing in training.seobook.com & somehow accidentally hit enter after typing train & when the URL completion didn't work I got the following SERP.
If you click the feature video link it does a YouTube video overlay. The other links lead into the relevant iTunes webpage.
Such media extensions have been in place for movies for quite a while now, but this is the first time I have seen them on music-related search results. In time one could expect similar ad expansions to hit other media areas like books, games, and maybe even other vertical search features. Google could possibly roll it out globally on brand searches as well at some point, allowing companies to offer intro videos (or even reviews of new product lines) directly in the search results.
Categories:
Source: http://www.seobook.com/musical-adwords
use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic
Google AdWords Ads Add Album Cover & Song Preview
Before I get any drops of jupiter hate on the following...I was typing in training.seobook.com & somehow accidentally hit enter after typing train & when the URL completion didn't work I got the following SERP.
If you click the feature video link it does a YouTube video overlay. The other links lead into the relevant iTunes webpage.
Such media extensions have been in place for movies for quite a while now, but this is the first time I have seen them on music-related search results. In time one could expect similar ad expansions to hit other media areas like books, games, and maybe even other vertical search features. Google could possibly roll it out globally on brand searches as well at some point, allowing companies to offer intro videos (or even reviews of new product lines) directly in the search results.
Categories:
Source: http://www.seobook.com/musical-adwords
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
How Did You Choose Your Primary Search Engine?
When you search, how did you pick your primary search engine?
Most people use the search engine which they believe has the best relevancy, whatever their computer came with, or what a friend recommended.
| Vote | All�(1190)� |
|---|---|
| it has superior relevancy | 30.4%�(+3.0 / -2.9) |
| the computer had a default selected | 26.8%�(+2.9 / -2.7) |
| a friend told me about it | 23.1%�(+2.9 / -2.7) |
| I saw it on a TV ad | 10.3%�(+2.3 / -1.9) |
| it came bundled with software | 9.5%�(+2.3 / -1.9) |
Men are more inclined to believe in superior relevancy, whereas women are more likely to use the default or what a friend recommends
| Vote | Men�(621)� | Women�(569)� |
|---|---|---|
| it has superior relevancy | 35.4%�(+4.2 / -3.9) | 25.5%�(+4.4 / -4.0) |
| the computer had a default selected | 21.8%�(+3.7 / -3.3) | 31.5%�(+4.6 / -4.3) |
| a friend told me about it | 21.3%�(+3.7 / -3.3) | 24.8%�(+4.5 / -4.0) |
| I saw it on a TV ad | 11.9%�(+3.1 / -2.5) | 8.8%�(+3.5 / -2.6) |
| it came bundled with software | 9.7%�(+2.9 / -2.3) | 9.3%�(+3.8 / -2.8) |
The youngest age group is easiest to influence with advertising or buying the default placement. 25 to 34 is more concerned about relevancy & older people are more likely to have it bundled with software than younger people are.
| Vote | 18-24 year-olds�(289)� | 25-34 year-olds�(309)� | 35-44 year-olds�(151)� | 45-54 year-olds�(186)� | 55-64 year-olds�(167)� | 65+ year-olds�(88)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| it has superior relevancy | 30.1%�(+5.5 / -5.0) | 36.9%�(+5.9 / -5.5) | 32.4%�(+7.8 / -6.9) | 28.2%�(+7.0 / -6.1) | 27.6%�(+7.7 / -6.6) | 28.0%�(+10.8 / -8.7) |
| the computer had a default selected | 29.0%�(+5.5 / -4.9) | 23.8%�(+5.4 / -4.7) | 27.6%�(+7.6 / -6.5) | 24.2%�(+6.8 / -5.7) | 26.0%�(+7.6 / -6.4) | 26.1%�(+11.3 / -8.8) |
| a friend told me about it | 20.7%�(+5.0 / -4.3) | 21.1%�(+5.5 / -4.6) | 23.8%�(+7.7 / -6.3) | 24.8%�(+7.0 / -5.9) | 25.0%�(+7.4 / -6.2) | 24.6%�(+11.4 / -8.7) |
| I saw it on a TV ad | 14.2%�(+4.5 / -3.6) | 10.8%�(+4.2 / -3.1) | 10.5%�(+6.0 / -4.0) | 12.8%�(+5.7 / -4.1) | 8.3%�(+5.5 / -3.4) | 3.1%�(+10.7 / -2.5) |
| it came bundled with software | 6.0%�(+3.4 / -2.2) | 7.5%�(+3.9 / -2.6) | 5.8%�(+5.4 / -2.9) | 10.0%�(+5.3 / -3.6) | 13.1%�(+5.8 / -4.2) | 18.2%�(+10.6 / -7.3) |
People out west tend to be more concerned with / driven by perceived relevancy. People in the midwest rely more on word of mouth. People in the south and north east are more likely to use the default.
| Vote | The US Midwest�(236)� | The US Northeast�(317)� | The US South�(369)� | The US West�(268)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| it has superior relevancy | 24.4%�(+6.8 / -5.7) | 29.8%�(+5.9 / -5.3) | 29.6%�(+5.3 / -4.8) | 37.2%�(+6.6 / -6.2) |
| the computer had a default selected | 27.3%�(+6.7 / -5.8) | 29.3%�(+6.0 / -5.3) | 29.8%�(+5.5 / -5.0) | 19.8%�(+5.6 / -4.7) |
| a friend told me about it | 25.6%�(+6.9 / -5.9) | 18.4%�(+5.4 / -4.4) | 22.6%�(+5.3 / -4.5) | 25.0%�(+6.1 / -5.3) |
| I saw it on a TV ad | 11.5%�(+5.8 / -4.0) | 12.6%�(+4.6 / -3.5) | 9.8%�(+4.4 / -3.1) | 8.2%�(+4.6 / -3.0) |
| it came bundled with software | 11.2%�(+6.1 / -4.1) | 9.9%�(+4.5 / -3.2) | 8.1%�(+4.3 / -2.9) | 9.7%�(+5.1 / -3.5) |
Here is data by population density.
| Vote | Urban areas�(612)� | Rural areas�(107)� | Suburban areas�(445)� |
|---|---|---|---|
| it has superior relevancy | 29.9%�(+4.2 / -3.9) | 27.8%�(+9.9 / -8.1) | 30.4%�(+5.3 / -4.8) |
| the computer had a default selected | 27.2%�(+4.4 / -4.0) | 27.7%�(+9.5 / -7.9) | 26.5%�(+5.1 / -4.5) |
| a friend told me about it | 23.1%�(+4.3 / -3.8) | 25.1%�(+9.6 / -7.6) | 23.2%�(+4.8 / -4.2) |
| I saw it on a TV ad | 10.4%�(+3.8 / -2.9) | 8.7%�(+8.6 / -4.5) | 10.5%�(+4.6 / -3.3) |
| it came bundled with software | 9.4%�(+4.0 / -2.9) | 10.6%�(+8.8 / -5.1) | 9.3%�(+4.5 / -3.1) |
There doesn't appear to be any obvious correlations with age.
| Vote | People earning $0-24K�(133)� | People earning $25-49K�(658)� | People earning $50-74K�(315)� | People earning $75-99K�(68)� | People earning $100-149K�(18)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| it has superior relevancy | 32.8%�(+9.1 / -7.9) | 29.8%�(+4.2 / -3.9) | 30.9%�(+6.5 / -5.8) | 27.7%�(+11.9 / -9.4) | 32.6%�(+21.2 / -15.9) |
| the computer had a default selected | 21.7%�(+8.6 / -6.7) | 29.0%�(+4.3 / -4.0) | 22.1%�(+6.0 / -5.0) | 30.7%�(+12.4 / -10.1) | 20.9%�(+22.5 / -12.6) |
| a friend told me about it | 23.5%�(+9.0 / -7.1) | 24.5%�(+4.1 / -3.7) | 20.1%�(+6.0 / -4.9) | 17.2%�(+12.0 / -7.7) | 13.9%�(+23.4 / -9.7) |
| I saw it on a TV ad | 11.8%�(+7.3 / -4.7) | 8.4%�(+3.5 / -2.5) | 15.6%�(+6.0 / -4.5) | 4.2%�(+13.7 / -3.3) | 25.6%�(+22.1 / -14.1) |
| it came bundled with software | 10.2%�(+7.7 / -4.6) | 8.3%�(+3.3 / -2.4) | 11.4%�(+5.5 / -3.9) | 20.2%�(+12.2 / -8.4) | 7.0%�(+27.3 / -5.9) |
Categories:
Source: http://www.seobook.com/how-did-you-choose-your-primary-search-engine
Search Results Compared
Search in all three major SEs at the same time and displays the results on a single page. Very useful when it comes about comparing top SERPs.
Source: http://www.yahoogooglemsn.com
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Making Money Online Google AdSense For a Successful Online Business
AdSense is an online advertisement serving application ran by Google Website developers and owners can use this application to enable text, images, and videos for advertisement purposes on their websites
Linggo, Mayo 27, 2012
Time To Get Super Serious About Lifeless Landing Pages
Creating the ultimate landing page is not at all difficult if you know where you’re going; most of the bad landing pages have the common flaws that they refuse to accept. Regardless of how long you have been doing online business, success with a squeeze or landing page will be based on what you know [...]
Source: http://www.trafficmystic.com/239/time-to-get-super-serious-about-lifeless-landing-pages/
seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink
Dogpile Search Comparison
based on a study that only 1.1% of the top results for Google, Yahoo, MSN and Ask Jeeves are the same their tools gives you the top results from any 3 of the top 4 search engines.
How to Write Your First Copy Productively.
Is this your first time when it comes to copywriting? Have you been trying to produce your first copy the best way that you can? If you answered yes, then the following article will be very helpful to you. Don’t Complicate Things: One of the main goals that you should have in your mind is [...]
Source: http://www.trafficmystic.com/228/how-to-write-your-first-copy-productively/
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Search Engine Ranking Report
provides you with Google & Yahoo Rankings for multiple keywords. Just paste your key phrases, enter you domain and wait for the results. You can query up to 1000 deep. Very use full tool.
The Google Penguin Update: Over-Optimization, Webspam, & High Quality Empty Content Pages
Huge Update
Google recently launched their webspam Penguin update. While they claim it only impacted about 3.1% of search queries, the 3.1% it impacted were largely in the "commercial transactional keywords worth a lot of money" category.
Based on the number of complaints online about it (there is even a petition!) this is likely every bit as large as Panda or the Florida update. A friend also mentioned that shortly after the update WickedFire & TrafficPlanet both had sluggish servers, yet another indication of the impact of the update.
Spam vs OOP
Originally leading up to the update, the update was sold as being about over-optimization. However when it was launched it was given no pet name, but rather given the name of the webspam update. Thus anyone who complained about the update was by definition a spammer.
A day after declaring that the name didn't have any name Google changed positions and called the update the Penguin update.
Why the quick turn around on the naming?
If you smoke a bunch of webmasters & then label them all as spammers, of course they are going to express outrage and look for the edge cases that make you look bad & promote those. One of the first ones out of the gate on that front was a literally blank blogspot blog that was ranking #1 for make money online.
As I joked with Eli, if it is blank then they couldn't have done anything wrong, right? :D
Another site that got nailed by the update was Viagra.com. It has since been fixed, but it is pretty hard for Google to state that the sites that got hit are spam, blend the search ads into the results so much that users can't tell them apart & force Pfizer to buy their own brand to rank. If that condition didn't get fixed quickly I am pretty certain it would lead to lawsuits.
Google also put out a form to collect feedback about the update. They only ever do that if they know they went too far and need to refine it. Or, put another way, if this was the Penguin update then this is GoogleBot:
So Worried About Manipulation That They Manipulate Themselves
When I was a kid I used to collect baseball cards. As the price of pictures from sites like iStockphoto have gone up I recently bought a few cards on eBay (in part for nostalgia & in part to have pictures for some of our blog posts). Yesterday I searched for baseball card holders for mini-cards & in the first page of search results was:
- a big ecommerce site where the review on that product stated that the retail described the quantity as being 10x what you actually get (the same site had other better pages)
- a user-driven aggregator site with a thin affiliate post made years ago & attributed to a site that no longer exists
- a Facebook note that was auto-generated from a feed
- an old blogspot splog
- a broader tag page for a social site
- a Yahoo! Shopping page that was completely empty
That blank Yahoo! Shopping page is also what showed up in Google's cache too. So I am not claiming that they were spamming Google in any way, rather that Google just has bad algorithms when they rank literally blank pages simply because they are on an authoritative domain name.
The SERPs lacked expert blogs, forum discussions, & niche retailers. In short, too much emphasis on domain authority yet again.
Part of the idea of the web was that it could connect supply and demand directly, but an excessive focus on domain authority leads users to have to go through another set of arbitragers. Efforts to squeeze out micro-parasites has led to the creation of macro-parasites (and micro-parasites that ride on the macro-parasite platforms).
SEO-based Business Models
Now more than ever SEO requires threading the needle: being sufficiently aggressive to see results, but not so aggressive that you get clipped for it (and hopefully building enough protection that makes it harder for others to clip you). That requires a tighter integration of the end to end process (tying efforts into analytics & analytics back into efforts) & a willing to view SEO through a broader marketing lens & throwing up a number of hail marry passes that likely won't on their own back out but will give you a lower risk profile when combined with your other stuff.
And your business model is probably far more important than your SEO skill level is. Imagine running a consulting company for a lot of small business customers for a few hundred Dollars a month each, based on stable rankings & then dealing with a tumultuous update that hits a number of them at the same time. And then they see an older (abandoned even) competing site of lower quality with fewer links ranking and they think you are selling them a bag of smoke. These sorts of updates harm the ability to do SEO consulting for anyone who isn't consulting the big brands. Yes many people made it through this update unscathed, but how many of these sorts of updates can one manage to slide through before eventually getting clipped?
The Unknowable Future
As search evolves, invariably anyone who is doing well in the ecosystem will at some point face setbacks. Those may happen due to an algorithm update or an interface change where Google inserts itself in your market. If you never get hit, it means you were only operating at a fraction of your potential. If you consistently get hit, you might be aiming too low. Many trends can be predicted, but the future is unknowable, so set up a safety cushion when things are going well.
This year Google has moved faster than any year in their history (massive link warnings, massive link penalties, tighter integration of Panda & now Penguin) & the rate of change is only accelerating. Go back about 125 years and a candle wick adjuster was cutting edge technology marketed as brand spanking new:
Blekko has a decently competitive search service which they manage to run for only a few million a year. As computers get cheaper & Google collects more data think of all the different data points they will be able to layer into their relevancy algorithms. In some markets Chrome has more marketshare than Internet Explorer does & Android is another deep data source. And they can know what user data to trust most by tracking things like if they have a credit card or phone verified on file & how often they use various services like Gmail or YouTube. Google+ is just icing on the cake.
At the same time, they need to improve. As the search algorithms get better, so do the business models that exploit them:
I asked Kristian Hammond what percentage of news would be written by computers in 15 years. ?More than 90 percent.?
There will be many more casualties in that war.
Categories:
Sabado, Mayo 26, 2012
Reasons for Hiring a Professional SEO Expert for a Local Business
Hiring a professional SEO expert for a local business has become imperative because more and more local shoppers are no longer consulting the Yellow Pages, newspapers and other printed materials but instead are using online resources. The sustainability of the local business could be severely compromised if it does not have a site for local [...]No related posts.
seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book
Keyword Density
will analyze your entered URL, and return a list of key phrases with their corresponding density values for one, two, or three word key phrases. You can choose whether you want the longs key phrase to be 1, 2 or 3 words long.
Retrieve SERPs
Google dataceter SERP checker. Input the keyword and select the range of datacenter IP's and see the SERPs.
Source: http://www.seocritique.com/serptool/serplist.htm
seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book link building
HTML Header Viewer
gives shows you the the HTTP headers that the web server is sending. Shows Cookies being sent, re-directs and mini-type.
Source: http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/http-header-viewer.shtml
seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink
Google Keyword Suggestions
give you relevant and popular terms related to the keyword you search for. This tool queries information from Google searches for your keyword and determines popular and re-occurring terms and displays them with a field that shows there relevent per cent. Very good tool.
Source: http://www.seochat.com/seo-tools/keyword-suggestions-google/
seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book link building
Biyernes, Mayo 25, 2012
Keyword Density Analyzer
gives you keyword density for 1, 2 and 3 word combinations.
Domain Directory Checker
checks your domain to see if it appears in Business.com, DMOZ, Gimpsy, GoGuides.com, Jayde, JoeAnt, Skaffe, Websavvy, Yahoo, and Zeal.
Source: http://www.123promotion.co.uk/directory/
use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic
Google PageRank Report
lets you check the PR of unlimited number of sites at a time. Now all you have to do is cut and paste you list of webpages and there you have it all before you with one click. Very nice!
Source: http://www.top25web.com/pagerank.php
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Contact us
Please input your informations and your message in contact form. We will reply you as soon as posible. Unless, you can use Live support feature to chat with our staff.
Source: http://goodbacklink.info
use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic
Meta Tag Generator
creates meta tags with title, description, abstract, keywords, robots revisit, robots index, rating, distribution, and Language.
Source: http://www.searchbliss.com/free_scripts_metatag.htm
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Yahoo vs Google
enables you to enter a keyword and displays a page of the linked search results from Yahoo and Google on any webpages that come up in the top 100 search results.
Source: http://www.langreiter.com/exec/yahoo-vs-google.html?q=
Huwebes, Mayo 24, 2012
"Educating" the Market
Is outing & writing polarizing drivel hate baiting or a service to the community?
It is all a matter of perspective, isn't it?
Some people would like to claim that it is one thing when they do it & something else when somebody else does it.
Unfortunately for those who want to have their cake & eat it too, consistency matters.
Even these guys know that.
If you brand those who fall outside the guidelines or get hit by updates as scammers to be avoided, then when your company gets caught working an angle & "scamming" (based on your own past sermons) your own judgement gets cast against yourself.
Is that fair?
In a word: yes.
Any belief system that is imposed onto others, but unacceptable when imposed upon the person who states it, isn't a belief system at all. It's duplicitous hackery at best - possibly much worse.
If your own company doesn't follow your own advice, then what does that say about your value systems? How many people have had their potential held back by listening to your misinformation & making the unfortunate mistake of trusting you? What does that sort of behavior do to the reputation of the industry? Now everyone else is suspect because you pitched bogus pablum at newbies.
To speak publicly about the pitfalls of doing "blackhat" techniques and then turn around and be caught red-handed for the same just gives credibility to the naysayers claiming our industry is filled with slime balls.
If you want to be a polarizing asshat, then don't be surprised when you eat your own cooking. To expect anything less is an open expression of ignorance of the field of inbound marketing marketing.
Categories:
Source: http://www.seobook.com/educating-market
seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book
Search Engine Position Checker
allows you to enter your keyword phrases and site URL and then displays the top 50 position for those keyword phrases in Altavista, Excite, Google, Yahoo, HotBot, MSN, WiseNut, Alltheweb and Teoma.
Source: http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/search-engine-position-checker.shtml
seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book link building
Watchfire WebXACT
analyses your web page for w3c validation, alt tags, all your meta tags, and much much more. How 4 pages of things it checks.
Similar Page Checker
helps you determine if the content of your webpage's to similar as you can be penalizes for having similar webpage's on the same website.
Source: http://www.webconfs.com/similar-page-checker.php
use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic
Link Price Calculator
This tools will help you determine the appropriate amount you should be paying (or charging) per month for a text link (ad) from each and every page of the specified website.
The tool takes into consideration factors such as number of pages, Pagerank, backlinks, Alexa traffic rank, and age of the website.
The tool takes into consideration factors such as number of pages, Pagerank, backlinks, Alexa traffic rank, and age of the website.
Miyerkules, Mayo 23, 2012
Marketing For Today
Now with many advertising tactics around, as well as a substantial variety of promoting tools getting introduced, companies tend to be often left lost as to precisely what technique they will need to utilize. Gorilla promoting is becoming an exhilarating method for men and women to be able to market their own products and services. [...]No related posts.
Source: http://www.seo-leaders-online.co.za/seo/marketing-for-today/
Search Term Suggestion Tool
allows you to enter a prospective keyword and it returns the related keyword phrases and the number of times they have been searched in the last month on Overture search engines such as Yahoo, MSN, Altavista and Hotbot. You use this kind of data to help you choose the keyword phrases you want to target. This tool is a "must use" as you don't want to target keywords that no one is searching for!
Source: http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/
seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink
Internet Marketing For Earning Online
You can find low chances to find a real company Internet advertising chance about the web these days. The issue is that marketers don’t appear within the right locations. Most from the promises that claim to make you rich overnight are scams, and you’d make a big mistake to fall for them. A real possibility [...]No related posts.
Source: http://www.seo-leaders-online.co.za/seo/internet-marketing-for-earning-online/
use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic
Keyword Grouper
If you already have a keyword list, the Free Keyword Grouper can transform up to 10,000 keywords into an organized keyword structure ready for high-performance PPC campaigns and an SEO-friendly information architecture.
Source: http://www.wordstream.com/keyword-grouper/
seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book link building
Cache.it
Shows PR, ping time, IP addy, what country the site is hosted in, thumbnail, meta tag text, cache status, Alexa ranking, and docs in different datacenters.
Source: http://www.cached.it/english/
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Martes, Mayo 22, 2012
Search Engine Position Checker
allows you to enter your keyword phrases and site URL and then displays the top 50 position for those keyword phrases in Altavista, Excite, Google, Yahoo, HotBot, MSN, WiseNut, Alltheweb and Teoma.
Source: http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/search-engine-position-checker.shtml
Which Source Do You Trust Most?
Which do you trust most as a source of advice on important issues?
People tend to trust friends & family and the mainstream media far more than they trust websites & search engines.
| Vote | All�(1204)� |
|---|---|
| friends & family | 37.1%�(+3.0 / -2.9) |
| newspapers | 32.5%�(+3.0 / -2.8) |
| search engines | 19.3%�(+2.6 / -2.4) |
| social media websites | 6.7%�(+2.0 / -1.6) |
| weblogs | 4.4%�(+1.9 / -1.3) |
Relative to one another, men tend to trust newspapers, search engines & weblogs more; whereas women tend to trust friends & family and social media websites more.
| Vote | Men�(643)� | Women�(561)� |
|---|---|---|
| friends & family | 34.7%�(+4.0 / -3.8) | 39.4%�(+4.6 / -4.4) |
| newspapers | 34.1%�(+4.0 / -3.8) | 31.0%�(+4.4 / -4.1) |
| search engines | 20.1%�(+3.5 / -3.1) | 18.6%�(+3.9 / -3.4) |
| social media websites | 5.7%�(+2.5 / -1.8) | 7.6%�(+3.3 / -2.3) |
| weblogs | 5.5%�(+2.5 / -1.8) | 3.4%�(+3.3 / -1.7) |
The youngest age group tends to trust social media a bit more & newspapers a bit less than other age groups do. Outside of that, it is somewhat hard to see other age-based patterns.
| Vote | 18-24 year-olds�(278)� | 25-34 year-olds�(307)� | 35-44 year-olds�(158)� | 45-54 year-olds�(191)� | 55-64 year-olds�(166)� | 65+ year-olds�(104)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| friends & family | 39.8%�(+5.8 / -5.5) | 34.2%�(+5.8 / -5.4) | 38.9%�(+7.8 / -7.2) | 34.0%�(+6.9 / -6.3) | 36.3%�(+7.6 / -6.9) | 37.2%�(+9.8 / -8.8) |
| newspapers | 26.2%�(+5.5 / -4.8) | 35.8%�(+5.9 / -5.5) | 33.9%�(+7.7 / -6.9) | 31.7%�(+6.8 / -6.1) | 33.1%�(+7.6 / -6.8) | 34.6%�(+10.0 / -8.8) |
| search engines | 19.7%�(+5.1 / -4.2) | 16.8%�(+4.9 / -4.0) | 17.7%�(+6.7 / -5.2) | 23.5%�(+6.5 / -5.5) | 21.8%�(+7.1 / -5.7) | 17.7%�(+8.5 / -6.2) |
| social media websites | 11.0%�(+4.2 / -3.1) | 6.8%�(+3.6 / -2.4) | 3.6%�(+5.1 / -2.1) | 7.4%�(+4.6 / -2.9) | 4.3%�(+4.5 / -2.3) | 6.6%�(+8.0 / -3.8) |
| weblogs | 3.3%�(+2.8 / -1.5) | 6.4%�(+3.5 / -2.3) | 6.0%�(+5.1 / -2.9) | 3.4%�(+4.1 / -1.9) | 4.4%�(+5.3 / -2.5) | 3.9%�(+7.4 / -2.6) |
Here is data by geographic region.
| Vote | The US Midwest�(252)� | The US Northeast�(311)� | The US South�(372)� | The US West�(269)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| friends & family | 40.2%�(+6.9 / -6.6) | 39.0%�(+6.2 / -5.9) | 34.9%�(+5.3 / -5.0) | 36.1%�(+6.2 / -5.8) |
| newspapers | 30.4%�(+6.8 / -6.1) | 36.0%�(+6.1 / -5.7) | 33.7%�(+5.2 / -4.9) | 29.9%�(+6.1 / -5.5) |
| search engines | 21.5%�(+6.4 / -5.3) | 15.7%�(+5.2 / -4.1) | 18.7%�(+4.6 / -3.9) | 21.2%�(+5.5 / -4.6) |
| social media websites | 6.7%�(+5.1 / -3.0) | 5.2%�(+4.3 / -2.4) | 6.6%�(+3.8 / -2.5) | 7.9%�(+4.5 / -3.0) |
| weblogs | 1.3%�(+9.5 / -1.1) | 4.1%�(+4.3 / -2.1) | 6.2%�(+3.6 / -2.3) | 4.8%�(+4.3 / -2.3) |
Rural people tend to trust friends & family more, while urban people tend to trust newspapers more.
| Vote | Urban areas�(602)� | Rural areas�(91)� | Suburban areas�(480)� |
|---|---|---|---|
| friends & family | 30.9%�(+4.4 / -4.0) | 45.8%�(+11.3 / -10.9) | 38.7%�(+4.9 / -4.7) |
| newspapers | 38.5%�(+4.7 / -4.5) | 25.4%�(+11.3 / -8.7) | 30.0%�(+4.5 / -4.2) |
| search engines | 18.4%�(+4.2 / -3.6) | 20.2%�(+10.4 / -7.5) | 20.2%�(+4.3 / -3.7) |
| social media websites | 8.5%�(+4.1 / -2.8) | 2.3%�(+14.6 / -2.1) | 6.2%�(+4.3 / -2.6) |
| weblogs | 3.7%�(+4.2 / -2.0) | 6.3%�(+11.2 / -4.2) | 4.8%�(+4.3 / -2.3) |
The richer you are, the less you generally trust friends & family. The rich also trust newspapers & blogs more (though the blog data point had a small sample size).
| Vote | People earning $0-24K�(138)� | People earning $25-49K�(655)� | People earning $50-74K�(307)� | People earning $75-99K�(81)� | People earning $100-149K�(25)� |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| friends & family | 40.6%�(+8.7 / -8.2) | 38.2%�(+4.1 / -4.0) | 33.9%�(+6.3 / -5.8) | 36.6%�(+11.1 / -9.8) | 14.4%�(+19.1 / -9.1) |
| newspapers | 25.6%�(+9.1 / -7.4) | 30.6%�(+4.0 / -3.7) | 37.0%�(+6.4 / -6.0) | 42.2%�(+10.6 / -10.0) | 42.2%�(+20.3 / -18.0) |
| search engines | 22.8%�(+9.1 / -7.1) | 20.6%�(+3.7 / -3.3) | 17.4%�(+5.7 / -4.5) | 13.4%�(+10.9 / -6.4) | 22.0%�(+21.5 / -12.7) |
| social media websites | 7.2%�(+9.2 / -4.2) | 7.0%�(+3.2 / -2.3) | 5.4%�(+5.6 / -2.8) | 5.2%�(+13.2 / -3.9) | 5.8%�(+23.7 / -4.9) |
| weblogs | 3.8%�(+11.0 / -2.9) | 3.6%�(+3.5 / -1.8) | 6.3%�(+5.4 / -3.0) | 2.6%�(+18.2 / -2.3) | 15.6%�(+21.7 / -10.2) |
Categories:
Source: http://www.seobook.com/which-source-do-you-trust-most
Keyword Density Analyzer
Enter URL, will calculate and return the keyword density of key phrases which are 1,2 and 3 words long.
Source: http://www.seobench.com/keyword-density-analyzer/
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Consumer Ad Awareness in Search Results
For the following study, we asked "Does this search result have ads on it? " to 1,000 searchers, per search results. Due to these surveys requiring a smaller image (to fit the ad unit size) we chose search results that generally had more ads on them (typically 3 or 4) so that the background had a significant portion of real estate devoted to ads, in spite of its small size. The one exception here was DuckDuckGo, as it only displays one ad at most even on highly commercial keywords like credit cards.
Other than resizing the search result to fit, the only modifications we generally made were removing the graphic picture from the Wikipedia page near the top of the DuckDuckGo SERP (since a prior study showed that users presumed there was a correlation between graphics and the perception of ads) and that in most cases we removed the right sidebar. We did include the sidebar ads on 3 different Bing, Google, & Yahoo! search results so that we could compare the impact of sidebar ads vs not having a sidebar.
Executive Summary
The 3 big takeaways are:
- For most search engines, people are generally unaware of ads vs organic results if there are no ads in the right column ... most of these yes/no questions came down to about a 50/50 vote, even though all of them had ads on them. It is every bit as true today as it was in 2003.
- If there is a right column, the percent of people who voted that there are ads on the page jumps significantly. Thus it is pretty safe to say that people think ads are in the right column & that the right column is ads.
- In part perhaps due to placement and a lack of user knowledge between ads vs content, paid ads do significantly cannibalize organic traffic.
- SERP heat maps have shown heavy focus on the left column. This is perhaps why Google feels comfortable putting brand oriented Google+ promotions in the right column, while they put further ads at the bottom of the organic search results - people tend to view the left rail as organic search results and the right rail as ads.
- In the past Google also stated that graphic product ads in the right column got about double the CTR of text ads in the same location, thus if Google ever offers search-branding graphical campaigns I would expect those to primarily appear in the right column.
- Interestingly, among major search engines, Yahoo! (without sidebar) got more "yes, it has ads" votes than other search engines. In fact, Yahoo! without sidebar ads scored within 1% of Bing with sidebar ads.
- Years ago they decided to get out of search in part because they under-monetized competitors (in part due to paying arbitrages to destroy their click value by pumping their network full of fraudulent clicks). Advertisers didn't even have a mechanism to opt out of such scammy ad syndication until AFTER Yahoo! signed the search deal with Bing.
- Yahoo! still under-monetizes search (& complains about it publicly, blaming Bing) in part because Bing cut out a lot of the arbitrage, in part due to ad matching issues on longtail queries, and in part because Yahoo!'s ad background color is more noticeable to users, where other portals and search companies like Google & Bing blend it in so well that many users simply can not see it, particularly on laptops and older computers. Ask is the most aggressive ad blender of all search engines. If you click through to their results from a Google ad it plants a cookie to remove the background color on the Ask search result ads on all subsequent searches until you clear that cookie.
Combined Survey Results
For the question Does this search results have ads on it?
| search engine | yes | no |
|---|---|---|
| AOL | 53.1%�(+3.9 / -3.9) | 46.9%�(+3.9 / -3.9) |
| Ask | 52.0%�(+4.0 / -4.1) | 48.0%�(+4.1 / -4.0) |
| Ask Arbitrage | 51.6%�(+3.9 / -3.9) | 48.4%�(+3.9 / -3.9) |
| Bing | 50.2%�(+3.8 / -3.8) | 49.8%�(+3.8 / -3.8) |
| Bing w Sidebar | 57.7%�(+3.7 / -3.8) | 42.3%�(+3.8 / -3.7) |
| Dogpile | 44.7%�(+4.1 / -4.0) | 55.3%�(+4.0 / -4.1) |
| Duck Duck Go | 52.3%�(+3.9 / -3.9) | 47.7%�(+3.9 / -3.9) |
| 54.5%�(+4.0 / -4.0) | 45.5%�(+4.0 / -4.0) | |
| Google w Sidebar | 62.9%�(+3.6 / -3.8) | 37.1%�(+3.8 / -3.6) |
| Yahoo! | 56.8%�(+3.9 / -4.0) | 43.2%�(+4.0 / -3.9) |
| Yahoo! w Sidebar | 59.8%�(+3.9 / -4.1) | 40.2%�(+4.1 / -3.9) |
User Voting Images
Here are the images users saw when they voted:
AOL SERP
Ask SERP
Ask Arbitrage SERP
Bing SERP
Bing With Sidebar SERP
Dogpile SERP
DuckDuckGo SERP
Google SERP
Google With Sidebar SERP
Yahoo! SERP
Yahoo! With Sidebar SERP
Which SERP Has an Ad? (Maps vs AdWords Ads)
Prior to doing the above study, we asked users to please click on the search result which has an ad in it, listing search results side by side. Any bias presented in this (outside of both having smaller than actual sizes) impacts both images. At first we did a regular Google SERP where we included the branding & then we followed up with one that is more zoomed in on the actual search results but does not include branding. On the one that was less zoomed in people thought the map was an ad more often, but upon further zooming they thought it was roughly 50/50.
| SERP | All�(1172)� |
|---|---|
 �Left | 53.7%�(+3.3 / -3.4) |
 �Right | 46.3%�(+3.4 / -3.3) |
| SERP | All�(1198)� |
|---|---|
 �Left | 49.6%�(+3.4 / -3.4) |
 �Right | 50.4%�(+3.4 / -3.4) |
Comparing Google+ to Ads
Does this search result have ads on it?
| layout | yes | no |
|---|---|---|
| Google+ without ads | 56.3% (+3.1 / -3.1) | 43.7% (+3.1 / -3.1) |
| Google+ with ads | 56.9% (+3.2 / -3.2) | 43.1% (+3.2 / -3.2) |
| large top ads w/o Google+ | 53.6% (+3.2 / -3.2) | 46.4% (+3.2 / -3.2) |
Searchers tend to think that Google+ integration in the right rail is an ad unit. More people voted that Google+ without ads had ads in the search results than a SERP with 4 AdWords ad units and no Google+ integration.
Search Engine Ad Background Color
After seeing that users generally guessed no better than a coin toss at best in most cases, we decided to ask What background color do Google search results use to denote top left search advertisements? The same question was asked of Yahoo! & Bing search results.
Google| All�(1147)� | |
|---|---|
| none, they are white | 49.7%�(+3.2 / -3.2) |
| blue | 25.5%�(+3.0 / -2.8) |
| yellow | 10.6%�(+2.3 / -2.0) |
| pink | 7.0%�(+2.1 / -1.6) |
| purple | 7.2%�(+2.2 / -1.7) |
| Yahoo! | All�(1080)� |
|---|---|
| none, they are white | 44.6%�(+3.4 / -3.4) |
| blue | 20.9%�(+3.0 / -2.7) |
| yellow | 15.6%�(+2.7 / -2.4) |
| magenta | 11.2%�(+2.5 / -2.1) |
| orange | 7.7%�(+2.3 / -1.8) |
| Bing | All�(1063)� |
|---|---|
| none, they are white | 49.0%�(+3.6 / -3.6) |
| blue | 23.5%�(+3.2 / -3.0) |
| yellow | 13.0%�(+2.8 / -2.4) |
| purple | 7.5%�(+2.4 / -1.9) |
| pink | 7.1%�(+2.4 / -1.8) |
Bing scored highest, however blue also scored as the 2nd highest color for all 3 search engines. Nearly half of searchers believe that top ads have a white background, which highlights a general widespread lack of awareness of search ads.
| Search Engine | % Who Answered Correctly |
|---|---|
| Bing (blue) | 23.5% |
| Yahoo! (magenta) | 11.2% |
| Google (yellow) | 10.6% |
Ad Location on the SERP
Given how little awareness users have of ad background color, I decided to ask: Where might ads appear on search results at top search engines like Bing & Google?
| Vote | All�(1144)� |
|---|---|
| right column | 34.2%�(+3.4 / -3.3) |
| all 3 locations | 29.6%�(+3.2 / -3.0) |
| search results do not carry ads | 19.4%�(+3.0 / -2.7) |
| top of the left column | 9.2%�(+2.5 / -2.0) |
| bottom of the left column | 7.6%�(+2.4 / -1.9) |
Less than 3 in 10 answered the question correctly & nearly 20% of people do not think search results carry any ads, which explains how an algorithmic penalty can create a bad quarter, why Google was sued in Australia for misleading ads & why the Rosetta Stone vs Google case was overturned. Next time you hear a search engineer talk about clearly labeling paid links, ask them why they do such a poor job of it themselves!
User Trust in Ad Versus Organic Results
Ever since search engines have weeded out some of the more exploitative reverse billing fraud ads, trust in online ads has been growing. Based on the above, we wanted to see how users perceive ads vs organic search results, so I asked: Search engines include both algorithmic search results and ads in them. Which do you trust more?
| Answer | All�(1168)� |
|---|---|
| I trust both equally | 45.8%�(+3.3 / -3.2) |
| Algorithmic search results | 40.9%�(+3.2 / -3.1) |
| Ads that appear in search results | 13.3%�(+2.5 / -2.2) |
The above result surprised me given how people disliked money influencing search results. It is a strong compliment to the ads that only 40% of people trust the editorial more than the ads. However this number might be thrown off by the fact that many people are unaware of where the ads actually appear in the search results & what results are ads. (As noted above, most people voted that they thought that either search ads were only in the right column or that there weren't ads in the SERPs.)
Making Up for the Small Image Problem
One of the bigger issues with Google's current survey solution is that you are limited to rather small sized images. Such limitations do not harm asking a question like "what color does Google use for x" but they do make the search result a bit harder to see. To compensate for that problem we ran a separate survey on AYTM, where users were able to view a search result in full screen mode for 10 seconds & then they were asked 3 questions.
The purpose of the first question was to put a few seconds in between them seeing the image and them answering the second question. One other improvement that was made here (in addition to allowing users to see a larger sized search result image) was that we added an "I am not sure" answer to the questions. Below are the responses in table + graphic form, followed by the AYTM widget.
Where May Ads Appear on Google's Search Results Page?
| Location | Vote |
|---|---|
| in the right column | 28.70% |
| top of the left column | 6.20% |
| bottom of the left column | 1.90% |
| middle of the left column | 2.30% |
| search results do not have ads in them | 6.80% |
| I am not sure | 18.90% |
| right column & the top + bottom of the left column | 35.20% |
Did the Viewed Search Result Have Any Ads On It?
| Answer | Vote |
|---|---|
| I'm not sure | 41.00% |
| no | 12.40% |
| yes | 46.60% |
What Background Color Does Google Use to Denote Ads At the Top Left of Their Search Results?
| Answer | Vote |
|---|---|
| none, they are white | 28.10% |
| blue | 20.80% |
| purple | 1% |
| I'm not sure | 22.60% |
| pink | 6.80% |
| yellow | 20.70% |
Even directly after viewing a search result with 3 ads in it, most users are uncertain of where ads may appear, what color the ads are, and if the search result even had any ads in it!
Users confusing the yellow background as white shortly after seeing it is anything but an accident:
In a RGB color space, hex #fef7e6 is composed of 99.6% red, 96.9% green and 90.2% blue. Whereas in a CMYK color space, it is composed of 0% cyan, 2.8% magenta, 9.4% yellow and 0.4% black. It has a hue angle of 42.5 degrees, a saturation of 92.3% and a lightness of 94.9%. #fef7e6 color hex could be obtained by blending #ffffff with #fdefcd..
If you have an older monitor or a laptop which you are viewing at an angle these colors are nearly impossible to see.
Embed The AYTM Graph in Your Website
Here is the AYTM widget of the above 1,000 person survey, which you can embed in your website.
Embed Code:
Categories:
Source: http://www.seobook.com/consumer-ad-awareness-search-results
link building use seo seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online
Search Engine Placement Check
has you enter you keyword phrase and site URL and displays the top 30 results for your keyword phrase in Alltheweb, AltaVista, AOL, Dmoz, Google, AOL, HotBot, Lycos, MSN, Netscape and WiseNut.
Frequently answered questions
What the main services we provide?
-Answer: We just only provile the backlink profile services including normal packages and custom packages you chose. Your link will be built with other high page rank website including personal profiles, blog post, article...etc. All link is under the text link.
-Answer: We just only provile the backlink profile services including normal packages and custom packages you chose. Your link will be built with other high page rank website including personal profiles, blog post, article...etc. All link is under the text link.
Lunes, Mayo 21, 2012
Adsense Ad Display
lets you enter you URL and shows what AdSense ads would be displayed for that web page.
Link Popularity Checker
searches Google, Yahoo, MSN Search, Altavista, Alltheweb and Hotbot for inbound links to your site.
Source: http://www.prsearch.net/inbx.php
Google Rankings
searches for the entered URL and keyword in the first 1000 pages.
Source: http://www.googlerankings.com
seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink see book link building
Google Toolbar For Firefox
is a toolbar that installs on FireFox and shows you the pagerank number for each webpage you visit. Beware - this tool bar will make you more PageRank conscience.
Source: http://www.google.com/tools/firefox/toolbar/FT3/intl/en/
Keyword Density
will analyze your entered URL, and return a list of key phrases with their corresponding density values for one, two, or three word key phrases. You can choose whether you want the longs key phrase to be 1, 2 or 3 words long.
Source: http://www.seochat.com/seo-tools/keyword-density/
seo tools seo tool land seo leaders online traffic mystic good backlink
Mag-subscribe sa:
Mga Post (Atom)